The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has initiated an administrative enforcement proceeding against an investment adviser firm registered with the SEC for allegedly failing to file the quarterly Form13F from February 2017 until April 2022.
In the ever-evolving landscape of securities regulation, it is crucial for investment adviser firms registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to stay vigilant and informed about current enforcement actions. A recent cease-and-desist proceeding instituted by the SEC against a clean energy company has sent a clear message regarding whistleblower protections and the use of severance agreements. As a result, we’ll explore the implications of this enforcement action and how it relates to investment adviser firms in light of SEC Rule 21F-17.
The Division of Examinations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recently issued a Risk Alert dated September 6, 2023, that provides valuable insights into the examination process for investment advisers. This Risk Alert serves as a guide on how the SEC identifies investment advisers for examinations and the documents and information requested. Notably, it includes a separate attachment titled “Typical Initial Information Examiners Request of Investment Advisers” which is a helpful resource for investment advisers to understand what to expect during an SEC examination.
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recently initiated an enforcement action against with an investment adviser firm for allegedly failing to conduct sufficient fee audits which resulted in overcharging more than 10,900 investment advisory accounts, amounting to over $26.8 million in advisory fees. Without admitting or denying the SEC charges, the investment adviser firm has agreed to pay a $35 million civil penalty to settle this proceeding.
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recently announced an enforcement action against and settlement with an investment adviser firm related to solicitation arrangements with online content providers. The investment adviser firm allegedly paid over $8 million to more than 200 social media influencers and online newsletter providers for prospective client referrals without adhering to the required disclosure and documentation under the former Rule 206(4)-3 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The investment adviser firm has agreed to a cease-and-desist order, censure, and a $250,000 civil penalty to settle the charges by the SEC.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has proposed Rule 211(h)(2)-4 which requires an investment adviser registered with the SEC to address conflicts of interest that arise from the use of covered technologies which optimize, predict, guide, forecasts, or directs investment-related behaviors or outcomes.
